
- Student / Teacher
- English / Français
Introduction
Lesson Plan
Scenarios
Student Handouts
Just the Facts, Ma'am (pdf)
Whodunit
Investigation Sheet (pdf)
Instant
Messaging Log (pdf)
What's Up with That? Exercise
Sheet (pdf)
Student Primers
Surfing or Surveillance? (pdf)
Techno-tonomy - What is Privacy? (pdf)
The Law and
Privacy (pdf)
Techno-tonomy
Privacy Textbook 
Other
Resources
|
Introduction
Why Privacy
Education? |
|
Canadian
kids are among the most wired in the world. And although they
use the Internet for schoolwork – preferring the Net over the
library by a factor of 10 to 1 – they see it as much more than
a tool for learning. For
kids, the Internet is one of the most powerful ways to stay
connected to each other and to make new friends. In fact, they like the Net precisely because it gives them the
privacy they want – from parents, teachers and family members
– to connect with peers, try on new identities and explore social
roles2. |
94 % of
Canadian students have Internet access at home, and the majority of
them (61%) have a highspeed
connection1.
(Media
Awareness Network, 2005) |
|
From an adult perspective, the Internet is the least private of
spaces. Whether a young person is chatting on MSN or posting
an invitation to a party on their blog, adults know that others can
capture that information and use it for their own purposes. |
Supervision can help kids navigate online obstacles to
privacy, but research indicates that kids who use the Net for
social communication the most are still going to give out personal
information, whether or not they are supervised3.
Technical fixes, like software that captures children’s key strokes
or records their online conversations, have their own problems.
Davis argues that these types of surveillance tools may interfere
with the learning process4. They are also out of step
with what kids know about the Internet – it’s a great place to
connect with friends and extend their social network. Telling
kids never to give out personal information online is therefore out
of touch with their daily experiences. |
To
discern and to ‘own’ appropriate connections and justifications
requires a certain kind of ‘privacy’ from the teacher. That is, the
teacher, as authoritative source of knowledge, needs to be
distanced in some measure from the processes through which this
discernment and ownership is acquired. In some measure the teacher
must lack detailed access to the child’s thinking processes, at
least for some of the time, and the child must be aware that the
teacher lacks this access4.
(Davis,
2001)
|
|
In these circumstances, it is critical that we teach young people
how networked technologies change their experience of privacy, so
they can better manage their online social interactions and get the
full benefit of the Internet. This module seeks to meet this need,
by encouraging young people to think more deeply about the
relationship between privacy, anonymity and identity in a networked
world.
Sources:
- Media Awareness Network, “Young Canadians in a
Wired World: Phase II Student Survey,” 2005.
- Media Awareness Network, “Young Canadians in a
Wired World: Phase II Trends and Recommendations,”
2005.
- Valerie Steeves & Cheryl Webster, “Closing
the Barn Door: The Effect of Parental Supervision on Canadian
Children’s Online Privacy,” Bulletin of Science, Technology &
Society, 2008.
- Andrew Davis, “Do Children Have Privacy Rights
in the Classroom?,” Studies in Philosophy and Education,
200
|
|