|
Existing and Emerging Privacy-based Limits In Litigation and Electronic Discovery |
|
|
a blog*on*nymity ID TRAIL MIX by Alex Cameron
Privacy law is increasingly important in
litigation in Canada. Contemporary litigants routinely file requests
for access to their personal information under PIPEDA and its
provincial counterparts. Such requests can give a party a partial
head-start on litigation discovery, or aid a party in rooting out
information held by an opponent or potential opponent.
That said, with some possible room for improvement (at least in the
case of PIPEDA), [1] data protection law in Canada takes a relatively
hands-off approach when it comes to legal proceedings. Parties in legal
proceedings are generally required to disclose information in
accordance with long-standing litigation rules and are largely exempted
from restrictions that might otherwise be applicable under data
protection laws in other contexts. Yet, this does not mean that privacy
considerations are not relevant or applicable to discovery in legal
proceedings. This short article identifies some existing and emerging
privacy-based limits in litigation discovery at the intersection
between privacy interests and the need for full disclosure in
litigation.
To read the rest of this piece, visit: http://www.anonequity.org/weblog/archives/2007/08/existing_and_emerging_privacyb.php
|