|
THE TRUE COLOURS OF JUDGING / WORKSHOP ON THE REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY Canadian Association of Provincial Court Judges Moncton, New Brunswick September 14, 2006
On the Identity Trail researchers Jane Bailey, Val Steeves, Ian Kerr, Jacquelyn Burkell, Carlisle Adams, and project manager Carole Lucock
led a workshop on the reasonable expectation of privacy for 160 judges
from across the country in Moncton on September 14. The workshop is
part of the National Judicial Institute and Canadian Association of
Provincial Court Judges Annual Conference, The True Colours of Judging. Students Cynthia Aoki, Max Binnie and Natalie Senst assisted in the workshop.
This intensive one-day workshop focused on the analysis and application of the reasonable expectation of privacy standard as articulated in search and seizure jurisprudence in Canadian Courts, with special emphasis on the Supreme Court of Canada’s pronouncement in R. v Tessling, [2004] 3 S.C.C. 432, 2004 SCC 67 and the leading cases that have informed the development of a framework for analysis.
Workshop Materials
Background and Context Complete Cases Chart - Supreme Court of Canada Complete Cases Chart - Federal/Provincial/Territorial Court & Other Decisions Analysis Guide
Introduction to Session
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Technological Perspectives
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Psychological Perspectives
Click here to download the presentation slides.
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: The Sociological Perspective
Click here to download the presentation slides.
Tessling On My Brain: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, Technology, & the Future
|